Persuasive essay about animal testing
Inafter much heart searching, he tried out his rabies vaccine on a nine-year old boy, Joseph Meister, who had been bitten 14 times by a rabid dog You can help stop this cruelty. I also believe that animal testing is the wrong thing to do when there are many alternatives that would cause no harm to animals or humans.
Animal testing should be banned argumentative essay
A lot of medical experts would argue that animal testing is justifiable in order to save the lives of many people longer down the line through the development of medicines and lifesaving drugs. Three Sample Pros Lab animals help researchers find medical remedies. Write closing remarks related the examples to the topic sentence. Give sufficient relevant examples. Animal testing and medicine. You need to find convincing facts that can prove your position is right and will help you persuade your audience to change their mind and support your ideas or take a certain action. The harm that is committed against animals should not be minimized because they are not considered to be "human.
Next, the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subject to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits.
Animals suffer like human beings and die in labs with no protection from cruelty for creating new pesticides, drugs for erectile dysfunction, food ingredients, or eyeliners. Why is animal experimentation unethical?
Animal testing essay thesis
Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animal specimens, testing potentially deadly substances on animals is unnecessary. Arguments against animal testing. The most big, obvious, indisputable reason, is, that the animal testing is morally wrong. Is it ethical to genetically engineer animals? This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment" qtd. Until recently, scientists did not treat animals with the utmost respect and even used such methods as vivisection, or basically operating on a live animal without any form of anesthetic, as a means of testing on animals. Each year in the USA alone, an estimate of 70 million animals are taken away from their natural habitat, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and basically hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centres. To perform this test, the researchers hook the animals up to tubes that pump huge amounts of the test product into their stomachs until they die. Under what circumstances can animal testing be justified? Experiments that involve animals cost millions of dollars and are more expensive than other alternative methods. Lab experimentation involving animals is inhumane. Sources can be outdated, incorrect, biased, or simply not appropriate for your paper.
The question of what is considered proper treatment of animals has been highly debated by groups looking at both the moral and ethical issues of the situation. Each year in the USA alone, an estimate of 70 million animals are taken away from their natural habitat, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and basically hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centres.
based on 84 review